<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; News Quotes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/news/uncategorized/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com</link>
	<description>Contract negotiation and contract and ip litigation for technology and service businesses</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Facebook&#8217;s Clone Problem - Forbes.com July 21, 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2008/07/22/facebooks-clone-problem-forbescom-july-21-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2008/07/22/facebooks-clone-problem-forbescom-july-21-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News Quotes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2008/07/22/facebooks-clone-problem-forbescom-july-21-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Facebook&#8217;s Clone Problem
Andy Greenberg, 07.21.08, 6:00 PM ET
Complaint is Still Not Posted
On Friday, Facebook went on the legal warpath in Germany. That path, it seems, could end in China.
The social networking site filed a lawsuit against German site StudiVZ.com that alleges copyright infringement. StudiVZ is just one of many Facebook-like sites that recently have sprung [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2008/07/22/facebooks-clone-problem-forbescom-july-21-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube&#8217;s Legal Fig Leaf - Forbes.com July 3, 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2008/07/07/youtubes-legal-fig-leaf-forbescom-july-3-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2008/07/07/youtubes-legal-fig-leaf-forbescom-july-3-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News Quotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2008/07/07/youtubes-legal-fig-leaf-forbescom-july-3-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2008/07/07/youtubes-legal-fig-leaf-forbescom-july-3-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube&#8217;s Filter Fails to Please by Andy Greenberg (Forbes.com) October 18, 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/10/19/youtubes-filter-fails-to-please-by-andy-greenberg-forbescom-october-18-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/10/19/youtubes-filter-fails-to-please-by-andy-greenberg-forbescom-october-18-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Watermarking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News Quotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/10/19/youtubes-filter-fails-to-please-by-andy-greenberg-forbescom-october-18-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/10/19/youtubes-filter-fails-to-please-by-andy-greenberg-forbescom-october-18-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gwen Stefani&#8217;s Harajuku Lovers Brand vs. Forever 21</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/08/09/gwen-stefanis-harajuku-lovers-brand-vs-forever-21/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/08/09/gwen-stefanis-harajuku-lovers-brand-vs-forever-21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 14:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Brands]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News Quotes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/blog/2007/08/09/gwen-stefanis-harajuku-lovers-brand-vs-forever-21/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/08/09/gwen-stefanis-harajuku-lovers-brand-vs-forever-21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/lawrencepost.mov" length="368857" type="video/quick" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quoted: Financial Times: US files against China</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/04/10/quoted-financial-times-us-files-against-china/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/04/10/quoted-financial-times-us-files-against-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News Quotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/04/10/quoted-financial-times-us-files-against-china/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/04/10/quoted-financial-times-us-files-against-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Viacom v. Google (Viacom and Google had better read the Perfect 10 Case)</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/04/03/viacom-v-google-viacom-and-google-had-better-read-the-perfect-10-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/04/03/viacom-v-google-viacom-and-google-had-better-read-the-perfect-10-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News Quotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/04/03/viacom-v-google-viacom-and-google-had-better-read-the-perfect-10-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/04/03/viacom-v-google-viacom-and-google-had-better-read-the-perfect-10-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enter-Porn-Eur: Porn and the First Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/03/31/enter-porn-eur-porn-and-the-first-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/03/31/enter-porn-eur-porn-and-the-first-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Adult Webmaster Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News Quotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/03/31/enter-porn-eur-porn-and-the-first-amendment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/03/31/enter-porn-eur-porn-and-the-first-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recent Quotes</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/03/19/recent-quotes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/03/19/recent-quotes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News Quotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/03/19/recent-quotes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/03/19/recent-quotes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exit 2.0 - The Art of Reinventing Oneself</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2006/12/26/exit-20-the-art-of-reinventing-oneself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2006/12/26/exit-20-the-art-of-reinventing-oneself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 01:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News Quotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/archives/2006/12/26/exit-20-the-art-of-reinventing-oneself/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2006/12/26/exit-20-the-art-of-reinventing-oneself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Art Attack:  Ownership of paintings and other objects of value is being challenged on a number of legal fronts</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2006/12/01/news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2006/12/01/news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 01:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News Quotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/archives/2006/12/01/art-attack-ownership-of-paintings-and-other-objects-of-value-is-being-challenged-on-a-number-of-legal-fronts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2006/12/01/news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
