<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Discovery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/news/discovery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com</link>
	<description>Contract negotiation and contract and ip litigation for technology and service businesses</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Fighting Against Discovery Abuse and Winning</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/03/21/litigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/03/21/litigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/03/21/litigation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My experience has taught me that effective law and motion practice, both during and after the discovery period, has determined the success or failure in copyright and trademark actions, especially in the case of the 30(b)(6) deposition. The deposition of an entity, whether it is a public or private corporation, a partnership, association or governmental [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/03/21/litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
