<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Brands</title>
	<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com</link>
	<description>Piracy and Infringement Litigation</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Gwen Stefani&#8217;s Harajuku Lovers Brand vs. Forever 21</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/08/09/gwen-stefanis-harajuku-lovers-brand-vs-forever-21/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/08/09/gwen-stefanis-harajuku-lovers-brand-vs-forever-21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 14:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Brands]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News Quotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/blog/2007/08/09/gwen-stefanis-harajuku-lovers-brand-vs-forever-21/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Update: Gwen&#8217;s Harajuku Lover&#8217;s Complaint here]
Listen to my interview here   on the David Lawrence radio show  (August 08, 2007) on:
- the basics of trademark piracy claims
- whether there is any justification for the notion that copying a brand is anything other than stealing
- why businesses based on not coming up with their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Update: <a href='http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/08/09/gwen-stefanis-harajuku-lovers-brand-vs-forever-21/harajuku-complaint/' rel='attachment wp-att-65' title='Harajuku Complaint'>Gwen&#8217;s Harajuku Lover&#8217;s Complaint here</a>]</p>
<p>Listen to my interview <a href='http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/lawrencepost.mov' title='Lawrence 08092007'>here </a> <a href= http://www.thedavidlawrenceshow.com/potter_as_merlyn_harajuku_ripoff_and_more_objectivism_007357.html> on the David Lawrence radio show </a> (August 08, 2007) on:<br />
- the basics of trademark piracy claims<br />
- whether there is any justification for the notion that copying a brand is anything other than stealing<br />
- why businesses based on not coming up with their own designs have any place in our market place<br />
- do American consumers really not get that buying pirated goods (whether its a digital song or a clothing item) is no different than having your own &#8217;stuff&#8217; pilfered.<br />
- do you agree that copying is stealing or a form of flattery? Isn&#8217;t the flattery argument a ruse?</p>
<p>Let me know your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/08/09/gwen-stefanis-harajuku-lovers-brand-vs-forever-21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/lawrencepost.mov" length="368857" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monitor Your Brands Online: Or Else!</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/04/26/webmonitoring/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/04/26/webmonitoring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gregory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Brands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/blog/2007/04/26/webmonitoring/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We cannot stress enough the importance of monitoring your brands - business, product and service names - online.   Googling your  brand name - your actual trademark - is NOT enough.  We encourage clients to sign up for a monitoring service and client&#8217;s that do are in a much better position to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We cannot stress enough the importance of monitoring your brands - business, product and service names - online.   Googling your  brand name - your actual trademark - is NOT enough.  We encourage clients to sign up for a monitoring service and client&#8217;s that do are in a much better position to find out:</p>
<p>- if someone else is using your brand or mark</p>
<p>- if there is an in appropriate use of your mark</p>
<p>- if your brand is being eroded by a generic use</p>
<p>We often use <a href="http://http://www.compumark.thomson.com/do/pid/111" target="_blank">Thomson&#8217;s Web Monitoring Service</a> and do not mark it up when obtaining these services for clients.  I urge you to also look at the CCH solution but not to over look the benefits of knowing what is really going on out there. Remember what Andy Grove said - paranoia, by watching your competition, is good.</p>
<p><strong>Got a style guide?</strong> This is a separate issue from whether you are properly using your brand or mark which we won&#8217;t go into here.  If you are unsure whether your own use is up to par, let us know if we can help you be providing a style guide to your marketing group.  Think adjective generally as the standard for proper use of your mark.  Nothing - not even my web site which is just general info - is a substitute for having someone really look at how you are specifically using your brand or mark.  Give me a call if you would like to find out more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2007/04/26/webmonitoring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
