<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com</link>
	<description>Contract negotiation and contract and ip litigation for technology and service businesses</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on YouTube&#8217;s Legal Fig Leaf - Forbes.com July 3, 2008 by Bookmarks about Youtube</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2008/07/07/youtubes-legal-fig-leaf-forbescom-july-3-2008/#comment-1676</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks about Youtube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 06:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2008/07/07/youtubes-legal-fig-leaf-forbescom-july-3-2008/#comment-1676</guid>
		<description>[...] - bookmarked by 4 members originally found by jchady on July 17, 2008  YouTube’s Legal Fig Leaf - Forbes.com July 3, 2008  http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2008/07/07/youtubes-legal-fig-leaf-forbescom-july-3-2008/ - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] - bookmarked by 4 members originally found by jchady on July 17, 2008  YouTube’s Legal Fig Leaf - Forbes.com July 3, 2008  <a href="http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2008/07/07/youtubes-legal-fig-leaf-forbescom-july-3-2008/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2008/07/07/youtubes-legal-fig-leaf-forbescom-july-3-2008/</a> - [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on YouTube&#8217;s Legal Fig Leaf - Forbes.com July 3, 2008 by &#187; YouTube’s Legal Fig Leaf Forbes.com July 3, 2&#8230; 3 Some: What The World Is Saying About 3 Some</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2008/07/07/youtubes-legal-fig-leaf-forbescom-july-3-2008/#comment-1675</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; YouTube’s Legal Fig Leaf Forbes.com July 3, 2&#8230; 3 Some: What The World Is Saying About 3 Some</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2008/07/07/youtubes-legal-fig-leaf-forbescom-july-3-2008/#comment-1675</guid>
		<description>[...] YouTube’s Legal Fig Leaf Forbes.com July 3, 2&#8230; Privacy advocates have been dreading the day when Google’s massive store of personal information, collected from its search engine, &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] YouTube’s Legal Fig Leaf Forbes.com July 3, 2&#8230; Privacy advocates have been dreading the day when Google’s massive store of personal information, collected from its search engine, &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on YouTube&#8217;s Legal Fig Leaf - Forbes.com July 3, 2008 by &#187; YouTube’s Legal Fig Leaf - Forbes.com July 3, 2008 3 Some: What The World Is Saying About 3 Some</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2008/07/07/youtubes-legal-fig-leaf-forbescom-july-3-2008/#comment-1674</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; YouTube’s Legal Fig Leaf - Forbes.com July 3, 2008 3 Some: What The World Is Saying About 3 Some</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 07:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiracylawyer.com/2008/07/07/youtubes-legal-fig-leaf-forbescom-july-3-2008/#comment-1674</guid>
		<description>[...] YouTube’s Legal Fig Leaf - Forbes.com July 3, 2008 Stanton’s ruling also prevented some private data from being revealed: logs of visits to private videos uploaded to user accounts were excluded from the order. Google also succeeded in protecting the software code of a video-filtering &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] YouTube’s Legal Fig Leaf - Forbes.com July 3, 2008 Stanton’s ruling also prevented some private data from being revealed: logs of visits to private videos uploaded to user accounts were excluded from the order. Google also succeeded in protecting the software code of a video-filtering &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
